Can a cladogram be falsified?

Camilo J. Cela-Conde

Resumen


A bottom-up way is a means of reaching knowledge, starting at the bottom level of raw data, and arriving at the top level of a more general description. Several authors—such as Delson, Eldredge and Tattersall (1977), Skelton, McHenry and Drawhorn (1986), and Strait, Grine and Moniz (1997)— attempt to use bottom-up methodologies in the paleontological field. However, if problems like those of trait biases must be avoided, it seems difficult to disregard functional criteria when constructing cladograms. Since functional criteria works on a top-down way—starting at a higher level of knowledge we deduce a lower conclusion—the naïve aim of constructing phylogenies in an extreme bottom-up way ends up by being hard to reach.

 

Key words: Cladogram, falsification, phylogeny, bottom-up knowledge, hypodigm, parsimony scenario, phylogeny, species, ancestor-descendant relationship.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Cheney, D. L., and Seyfarth, R. M. (1992), “Precis of how monkeys see the world,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 135-182.

Collard, M., and Wood, B. (1999), “Grades among the African Early Hominids”, in T. G. Bromage and F. Schrenck (eds.), African Biogeography. Climate Change and Human Evolution (316-327), New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press.

Cracraft, J. (1974), ”Phylogenetic models and classification,” Systematic Zoology, 23: 71-90.

Cracraft, J. (1981), “Pattern and process in paleobiology. The role of cladistic analysis in systematic paleontology,” Paleobiology 7: 456-468.

Cracraft, J. (1987), “Species concept and the ontology of evolution,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 329-346.

Delson, E., Eldredge, N., and Tattersall, I. (1977). “Reconstruction of hominid phylogeny: a testable framework based on cladistic analysis”, Journal of Human Evolution, 6: 263-278.

De Queiroz, K., and Wimberger, P. H. (1993), “The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters,” Evolution 47: 46-61.

Engelmann, G. F., and Wiley, F. O. (1977), “The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction,” Syst. Zool. 26: 1-11.

Fodor, J. A. (1983), The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

Gutmann, W. F. (1977), “Phylogenetic reconstruction: theory, methodology, and application to chordate evolution,” in M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major patterns in vertebrate evolution (645-669), New York, NY: Plenum.

Hull, D. L. (1983), “Karl Popper and Plato’s metaphor,” in N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds.), Advances in cladistics (Vol. 2: 177-190). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Columbia University Press.

Kluge, A. G. (1997), “Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics,” Zoologica Scripta 26: 349-360.

Marshall, C. (1998), “Stratigraphic data have a role in phylogenetic analysis,” Nature debates, http://helix.nature.com/debates/fossil/fossil_2.html

Nelson, G. J. (1973), “Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships,” Systematic Zoology 22: 344-359.

Platnick, N. I., and Nelson, G. (1978), “A method of analysis for historical biogeography,” Systematic Zoology 27: 1-16.

Sanderson, M. J., and Donoghue, M. J. (1989), “Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy,” Evolution 43: 1781-1795.

Siddall, M. (1998), “The follies of ancestor worship,” Nature debates, http://helix.nature.com/debates/fossil/fossil_3.html

Siddall, M. E., and Kluge, A. G. (1997), “Probabilism and phylogenetic inference,” Cladistic 13: 313-336.

Simpson, G. G. (1975), “Recent Advances in Methods of Phylogenetic Inference” in W. P. Luckett and F. S. Szalay (eds.), Philogeny of the Primates (3-19), New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Skelton, R. R., and McHenry, H. M. (1998), “Trait list bias and a reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny,” Journal of Human Evolution 33: 109-113.

Skelton, R. R., McHenry, H. M., and Drawhorn, G. M. (1986), “Phylogenetic Analysis of Early Hominids,” Current Anthropology 27: 21-35.

Sober, E. (1983), “Parsimony in systematics: philosophical issues,” Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 14: 335-337.

Strait, D.S., Grine, F.E. and Moniz, M.A. (1997), “A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny,” Journal of Human Evolution 32: 17-82.

Szalay, F. S. (1999), “Paleontology and Macroevolution: On the Theoretical Conflict between and Expanded Synthesis and Hierarchic Punctuationism,” in T. G. Bromage and F. Schrenck (eds.), African Biogeography. Climate Change and Human Evolution (35-56), New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press.

Wiley, E. O. (1981), Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics, New York, N.Y., John Wiley.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787