From natural history to history: the scope and limits of evolutionary epistemology and teleosemantics as naturalist research programs
Resumen
This paper examines the feasibility of evolutionary epistemology and telesosemantics as naturalistic accounts of knowledge and intentionality. Both constitute a good example of what is called Philosophical Naturalism. After considering queries in both theories, we propose a different account in order to naturalize knowledge and meaning. The argumentative line defended is another kind of naturalization, one based on history and not only in natural history. From this point of view, concept fixation and epistemological justification practices are dependent on historical dynamics, not on natural history by itself.
Key words. Evolutionary epistemology, epistemological justification, history, natural history, Philosophical Naturalism, teleosemantics.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Braddon-Mitchell, D. & Jackson, F. (1997), “The teleological theory of content,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75(4): 474-489.
Braddon-Mitchell, D. & Jackson, F. (2002), “A pyrrhic victory for teleonomy,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80(3): 372-377.
Burge, T. (1979), “Individualism and the mental”, in French, et al., Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. Iv. University of Minnesota Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1974), “Evolutionary epistemology,” in Schlipp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper I, La Salle, Open Court, pp. 413-463.
Dretske, F. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information. NY: CSLI Publications.
Dretske, F. (1986), “Misrepresentation,” in Bogdan (ed.) Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, F. (1988), Explaining Behaviour. Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T Press.
Dretske, F. (1994), “The explanatory role of information,” Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London 349: 59-70.
Fodor, J. (1987), Psychosemantics. The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Fodor, J. (1990), A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T.
Gontier, Nathalie, J. P. Bendegem, and D. Aerts (eds.) (2006), Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture: A Non-Adaptationist, Systems Theoretical Approach. Dordrecht: Springer.
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H. & Cable, C. (1976), “Natural concepts in pigeons,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes 2: 285-301.
Jaume, A. (2011), “Teleología y semántica del contenido mental. Una investigación sobre los problemas de la fijación del contenido desde presupuestos naturalistas”, Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía XXXVIII: 305-328.
Macdonald, G. y Papineau, D. (eds.) (2006), Teleosemantics. London: Oxford University Press.
Millikan, R. G. (1984), Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press
Millikan, R. G. (1993), White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Millikan, R. G. (2002), Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Neander, K. (1991), “Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst's defence,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454-468.
Neander, K. (1995), “Misrepresenting and malfunctioning,” Philosophical Studies 79: 109-141.
Neander, K. (1996), “Swampman meets swampcow,” Mind & Language 11 (1): 118-129.
Neander, K. (2006a), “Naturalistic theories of reference,” in Devitt, M. and Hanley, R., The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp.374-391.
Neander, K. (2006b), “Content for cognitive science,” in Macdonald, G. and Papineau, D. (eds.), Teleosemantics. London: OUP, pp. 167-194.
Neander, K. (2008), “Teleological theories of mental content: Can Darwin solve the problem of intentionality,” in M. Ruse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papineau, D. (1987), Reality and Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Papineau, D. (1993), Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Popper, K. (1972), Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford,:Clarendon Press.
Quine, W. v .O. (1969), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sellars, W. (1991), Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero, California: RPC.
Sosa, E. (2007), A Virtue Epistemology. Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. (1999), The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Understanding. Oxford. O.U.P.
Ursúa, N. (1993), Cerebro y conocimiento: un enfoque evolucionista. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Vollmer (1984), “Mesocosm and objective knowledge—on problems solved by evolutionary epistemology”, in F. Wuketits (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, pp. 69-121.
Vollmer, G. (2005), “How is it that we can know this world? New arguments in evolutionary epistemology,” in Darwinism & Philosophy, V. Hösle and Christian Illies (eds.), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wuketits, F. M. (1984), “Evolutionary epistemology—a challenge to science and philosophy,” in F. Wuketits (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, pp.1-29.
Wuketits, F. M. (1995), “A comment on some recent arguments in evolutionary epistemology,” Biology and Philosophy 10: 357-363.
Wuketits, F. M. (2001), “The philosophy of Donald T. Campbell: A short review and critical appraisal,” Biology and Philosophy 16: 171-188.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787