Is there a phylogeny of Homo?
Resumen
Hypotheses of species genealogy are poorly supported when the species are closely related, and phylogenetics cannot be justified at all below the species level both for this reason and because the parsimony principle is invalid when there is reticulation. With the transfer of the habiline species out of Homo, several lines of evidence suggest that this genus has only a single lineage and therefore a species throughout the Pleistocene: Homo sapiens. Anatomical details supporting this contention are found in the continuity of different features in different regions. The emerging pattern shows population reticulation based on gene flow and population movement that reflects a network of interrelationships allowing adaptive changes to broadly spread throughout the species range. Genetic evidence precludes a recent small population size bottleneck, and thereby makes very unlikely an explanation of Pleistocene variation and evolution based on successive species replacements. Multiregional evolution remains both well supported and not refuted by these data, and this implies that Pleistocene human evolution and relationships must be studied without a taxonomic framework.
Key words: Taxonomy, phylogeny, species, evolutionary trees, multiregional evolution.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Asfaw, B.; Y. Beyene; G. Suwa, R. C.; Walter, T. D.; White, G.; WoldeGabriel and T. Yemane (1992), “The earliest Acheulean from Konso-Gardula,” Nature 360: 732-735.
Binford, L. R. (1989), “Approaching the transition to cultural adaptations: an organizational approach,” in E. Trinkaus (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans. Biocultural Adaptations in the Later Pleistocene. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge, pp. 18-41, and combined references for the volume on pp. 232-276.
Crummett, T. L. (1995), “The three dimensions of shovel-shaping,” in J. MoggiCecchi (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Dental Anthropology. International Institute for the Study of Man, Florence: Angelo Pontecorboli Editore, pp. 305-313.
Etler, D. A. (1996), “The fossil evidence for human evolution in Asia,” Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 275-301.
Flanagan, R. (1996), “Out of Africa,” Earth (February): 26-35.
Foley, R. A. and M. M. Lahr (1997), “Mode 3 technologies and the evolution of modern humans,” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7: 3-36.
Frayer, D. W. (1993), “Evolution at the European edge: Neanderthal and Upper Paleolithic relationships,” Préhistoire Européenne 2: 9-69.
Gabunia, L.; A. Vekua; D. Lordkipanidze; C. C. Swisher; R. Ferring; A. Justus; M. Nioradze; M. Tvalchrelidze; S. C. Antón; G. Bosinski; O. Jöris; M-A. de Lumley: G. Majsuradze and A. Mouskhelishvili (2000), “Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age,” Science 288:1019-1025.
Haeckel, E. (1876), The History of Creation, or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by Natural Causes. A Popular Exposition of the Doctrine of Evolution in General, and that of Darwin, Goethe, and Lamark in Particular. New York: Appleton.
Haeckel, E. (1883), The Pedigree of Man. London: Freethought.
Haeckel, E. (1905), The Wonders of Life. New York: Harper.
Hawks, J.; S-H. Lee; K. Hunley and M. Wolpoff (2000), “Population bottlenecks and Pleistocene human evolution,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 17 (1): 2-22.
Hawks, J. and M. H. Wolpoff (2001), “The accretion model of Neanderthal evolution,” Evolution (in press).
Hayden, B. (1993), “The cultural capacities of Neanderthals: a review and re-evaluation,” Journal of Human Evolution 24 (2): 113-146.
Houghton, P. (1993), “Neanderthal supralaryngeal vocal tract,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90 (2): 139-146.
Howell, F. C. (1996), “Thoughts on the study and interpretation of the human fossil record,” in W. E. Meikle; F. C. Howell and N. G. Jablonski (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Human Evolution. Wattis Symposium Series in Anthropology, California Academy of Sciences, Memoir 21: 1-45.
Howell, F. C. (1999), “Paleo-demes, species clades, and extinctions in the Pleistocene hominin record,” Journal of Anthropological Research 55: 191-244.
Klein, R. G. (1999), The Human Career, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition.
Kramer, A. (1991), “Modern human origins in Australasia: replacement or evolution?,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 86 (4): 455-473.
Lahr, M. M. (1996), The Evolution of Modern Human Diversity: A Study of Cranial Variation. Cambridge Studies in Biological Anthropology 18. Cambridge: University Cambridge Press.
Lahr, M. M. and R. A. Foley (1998), “Towards a theory of modern human origins: Geography, demography, and diversity in recent human evolution,” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 41: 137-176.
Lasker, G. W. and C. E. Crews (1996), “Behavioral influences on the evolution of human genetic diversity,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5 (1): 232-240.
Moore, J. H. (1994), “Putting anthropology back together again: the ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory,” American Anthropologist 96 (4): 925-948.
Pope, G. G. (1992), “Replacement versus regional continuity models: the paleobehavioral and fossil evidence from East Asia,” in T. Akazawa; K. Aoki and T. Kimura (eds.), The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia. Tokyo: Hokusen-sha, pp. 3-14.
Relethford, J. H. (1999), “Models, predictions, and the fossil record of modern human origins,” Evolutionary Anthropology 8 (1): 7-10.
Schepartz, L. A. (1993), “Language and modern human origins,” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 36: 91-126.
Schwartz, J. H. (2000), “Taxonomy of the Dmanisi crania,” Science 28 (W9): 55-56.
Slatkin, M. (1991), “Inbreeding coefficients and coalescent times,” Genetical Research 58: 167-175.
Simek, J. (1992), “Neanderthal cognition and the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition,” in G. Bräuer and F. H. Smith (eds.), Continuity or Replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 231-245.
Smith, F. H.; J. F. Simek and M. S. Harrill (1989), “Geographic variation in supraorbital torus reduction during the later Pleistocene, (c. 80,000-15,000 BP),” in P. Mellars and C. B. Stringer (eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 172-193.
Svoboda, J. (1993), “The complex origin of the Upper Paleolithic in the Czech and Slovak Republics,” in H. Knecht; A. Pike-Tay and E. White (eds.), Before Lascaux: The Complex Record of the Early Upper Paleolithic. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 23-36.
Szilvássy, J.; H. Kritscher and E. Vlèek (1987), “Die Bedeutung röntgenologischer Methoden für anthropologische Untersuchung ur- und frühgeschichtlicher Gräberfelder,” Annals of the Vienna Natural History Museum 89: 313-352.
Tattersall, I. (1994), “How does evolution work?,” Evolutionary Anthropology 3 (1): 2-3.
Tattersall, I. (1996), “Paleoanthropology and preconception,” in W. E. Meikle; F. C. Howell and N. G. Jablonski (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Human Evolution. Wattis Symposium Series in Anthropology, California Academy of Sciences, Memoir 21: 47-54.
Tattersall, I. (1997), “Out of Africa again and again?,” Scientific American 276 (4): 60-67
Tattersall, I. and J. H. Schwartz (2000), Extinct Humans. Boulder: Westview Press.
Templeton, A. R. (1996), “Gene lineages and human evolution,” Science 272: 1363.
Templeton, A. R. (1998), “Human races: a genetic and evolutionary perspective,” American Anthropologist 100 (3): 632-650.
Wiley, E. O. (1981), Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wolpoff, M. H. (1984), “Evolution in Homo erectus: the question of stasis,” Paleobiology 10 (4): 389-406.
Wolpoff, M. H. (1986), “Stasis in the interpretation of evolution in Homo erectus: a reply to Rightmire,” Paleobiology 12 (3): 325-328.
Wolpoff, M. H. (1991), “Homo erectus et les origines de la diversité humaine”, in: J. J. Hublin and A. M. Tillier (eds.), Aux Origines d’Homo sapiens. Nouvelle Encyclopédie Diderot. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 97-155.
Wolpoff, M. H. (1999a), Paleoanthropology, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wolpoff, M. H. (1999b), “Paleoanthropology: controversy without end or an end without controversy?,” Reviews in Anthropology 28: 267-288.
Wolpoff, M. H. (2000), “A comment on: The recognition and evaluation of homoplasy in primate and human evolution,” (Lockwood, C.A. and J.G. Fleagle, 1999) Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 42:189-232). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 113(2): 275-276.
Wolpoff, M.H. and R. Caspari (1997), Race and Human Evolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wolpoff, M. H. and R. Caspari (2000), “The many species of humanity,” Przeglad Antropologiczny 63 (1): 3-17.
Wolpoff, M. H.; J. Hawks; D. W. Frayer and K. Hunley (2001), “Modern human ancestry at the peripheries: a test of the replacement theory,” Science 291.
Wolpoff, M. H.; A. G. Thorne; J. Jelínek and Zhang Yinyun (1994), “The case for sinking Homo erectus: 100 years of Pithecanthropus is enough!,” in J. L. Franzen (ed.), 100 years of Pithecanthropus: The Homo erectus problem. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 171: 341-361.
Wood, B. and M. Collard (1999), “The changing face of genus Homo,” Evolutionary Anthropology 195-207.
Wu Xinzhi, (1995), “Morphological comparison between humans skulls of Middle Pleistocene from China and Europe,” in J. M. Bermúdez; J. L. Arsuaga and E. Carbonell (eds.), Human Evolution in Europe and the Atapuerca Evidence. Volume 1. Valladolid: Sever-Cuesta, pp. 243-248.
Wu Xinzhi (1997), “On the descent of modern humans in East Asia,” in G. A. Clark and C. M. Willermet (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 283-293, and combined bibliography on pp. 437-492.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787