El futuro desafío biológico a la teoría y a la práctica social

Steve Fuller

Resumen


The future biological challenge to social theory and practice

Biology very much remains ’the other’ of sociology. While this position is historically explicable, it is quickly becoming untenable. However, this does not mean that sociologists should turn into biologists. A sociology of biological knowledge readily shows that the two disciplines share more features than practitioners of either of them probably realize. Nevertheless, some recent attempts to bring biology and sociology closer together leave much to be desired, as they shortchange sociology’s contribution. My own strategy for interdisciplinary rapprochement is twofold. First, insight can be gained by treating sociology and biology as fields that historically have come to be mutually alienated, despite a significant overlap in cognitive interests. Second, perhaps the most fruitful focus for future interaction between sociology and biology is over matters in which innovative conceptions of the human condition have forced a reconceptualization of politics. These challenges arise in a neo-liberal ideological environment, which raises its own set of concerns, as epitomized by the phenomenon of ’bioprospecting’. I end by urging social theorists to resist the recent call to a ’Darwinian Left’ and look instead toward a ’critical sense of sympathy’ as the new basis for the social bond.

 

Key words: Sociology, biology, bioprospecting, Darwinian left, neo-liberalism, sympathy, disabilities, sociobiology, biotechnology, feminism.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Blackmore, S. (1998), The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brandon, R. and Burian, R. (eds.) (1984), Genes, Organisms and Populations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Croskery, P. (1989), “The intellectual property literature: a structured approach,” in V. Weil and J. Snapper (eds.) Owning Scientific and Technical Information. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, pp. 268-81.

Dasgupta, P. and David, P. (1994), “Toward a new economics of science,” Research Policy 23: 487-521.

Foder, J. (1981), Representations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Fuller, S. (1993), Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.

Fuller, S. (1997), Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Fuller, S. (1998), “Society’s shifting humancomputer interface: a sociology of knowledge for the information age,” Information, Communication and Society 1: 182-98.

Fuller, S. (1999), “Making the university fit for critical intellectuals: recovering from the ravages of the postmodern condition,” British Educational Research Journal 25: 583-95.

Gane, M. (1988), On Durkheim’s Rules of the Sociological Method. London: Routledge.

Glover, J. (1984), What Sort of People Should There Be? Genetic Engineering, Brain Control and their Impact on our Future World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Griffiths, P. (1997), “The Human Genetic Diversity Project and indigenous peoples,” Newsletter of the Otago Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand, May, pp. 1-2.

Haraway, D. (1990), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. London: Free Association Books.

Hermstein, R. and Murray, C. (1994), The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.

Horgan, J. (1996), The End of Science. Lexington, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

Howe, H. and Lyne, J. (1992), “Gene talk,” Social Epistemology 6: 109-63.

Mandelbaum, M. (1987), Purpose and Necessity in Social Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ree, J. (1999), I See a Voice: A Philosophical History of Language, Deafness and the Senses. London: Harper Collins.

Rosenberg, A. (1994), Instrumental Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Runciman, W. G. (1998), The Social Animal. London: HarperCollins.

Schwartz, J. (1999), “For sale in Iceland: a nation’s genetic code. Deal with research firm highlights conflicting views of progress, privacy and ethics,” The Washington Post, 12 January, p. A01.

Singer, P. (1999), A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Cooperation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Skaggs, B. (1997), Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.

Skinner, B. F. (1970), Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Alfred Knopf.

Turner. B. S. (1984), The Body and Society. London: Sage,

Watson, S. (1998), “The neurobiology of sorcery: Deleuze and Guattari’s brain,” Body and Society 4 (4): 23-45.

Wilson, E. O. (1998), Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred Knopf.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787